Matt writes....
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9d28c/9d28c9777a15985456893707896682075759adad" alt=""
My late night ruminations have included the following:
If the faculty unions continue to serve as mere cheerleaders and well-wishers in lieu of providing meaningful, reliable support to adjuncts in need: will the movement ever acquire the political power necessary to exact the sort of transformative legal and organizational change that will have a real, meaningful impact?
If we can’t increase the number of adjuncts moving in the same general direction (i.e., in opposition to the status quo), does that evidence a lack of determination to change our collective circumstances? Do we deserve the change some of us seek?
If the public remains blissfully unaware of the problem–which they certainly shall if the forgoing two considerations are not adequately addressed–will such change ever be politically possible?I got my start in this movement because my sensibilities were offended by the fact that my employer refused to sell me health insurance.... I had missed my one and only opportunity to buy the prohibitively expensive health insurance policy, and I was therefore out of luck.
That led me to an on-campus screening of a few films about the plight of adjuncts, and I was introduced to Maria Maisto and several other colleagues at The University of Akron who were interested in this issue. I discovered pretty quickly that I was a bit of a fish out of water as a politically active Republican swimming in a sea of…well…non-Republicans.
And yet, here I am, nearly four years after my introduction to the issue.
....
Read the rest of Matt's post, Wet Tinder: Will the Adjunct Movement Ever Catch Fire? at his blog, akronadjunct, also carried on the New Faculty Majority blog sidebar at the left of the page (if know your alphabet, you can find it ... begins with the letter 'a'). Matt is also on Twitter as @akronadjunct
No comments:
Post a Comment
pull up a soapbox and share your 2¢